Normal values of native T1 / T2 maps and ventricular function in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 3T scanner

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53903/01212095.312

Keywords:

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, Myocardium, Ventricular function

Abstract

Background: T1 and T2 maps are useful sequences in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for the detection of myocardial alterations. Normal values of native T1 maps depend on multiple factors, so each center must establish its own normal values. CMR is the reference imaging technique in the quantification of ventricular function, however, current studies are generally based on European
and US Caucasian population. Objective: To establish the normal reference values of native T1 and T2 maps and ventricular function in healthy individuals in a 3T MRI scanner. Methods: Crosssectional study in healthy individuals between 20 and 80 years old in Medellín who underwent CMR in 3T scanner. Native T1 and T2 map sequences and ventricular function were obtained. Mean
values, standard deviation and 95 % confidence interval were estimated for each age group and sex. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement was evaluated. Results: 64 healthy individuals (32 women) with a mean age of 47 years (SD: 15.1) were included. The mean native T1 value was 1177 ms ± 43.19 ms and T2 map value was 38.9 ms ± 2.66. Native T1 values increase with age in both sexes, and were higher in females. Most ventricular function values were higher in men and decreased with age in both sexes. Intra- and interobserver agreement was good. Conclusion: Normal values of native T1 and T2 maps and ventricular function in healthy individuals from Medellín are presented,
with good intra- and interobserver agreement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Granitz M, Motloch LJ, Granitz C, et al. Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers: Reference values and clinical implications. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019;131(7-8):143-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-018-1411-3.

Kim PK, Hong YJ, Im DJ, et al. Myocardial T1 and T2 mapping: Techniques and clinical applications. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18(1):113-31. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.1.113.

Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM, et al. Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8.

Dass S, Suttie JJ, Piechnik SK, et al. Myocardial tissue characterization using magnetic resonance noncontrast t1 mapping in hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(6):726-33. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.976738.

Ferreira VM, Piechnik SK, Dall’Armellina E, et al. Native T1-mapping detects the location, extent and patterns of acute myocarditis without the need for gadolinium contrast agents. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-16-36.

Karamitsos TD, Piechnik SK, Banypersad SM, et al. Noncontrast T1 mapping for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(4):488-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.013.

Sado DM, White SK, Piechnik SK, et al. Identification and assessment of Anderson- Fabry disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance noncontrast myocardial T1 mapping. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 May 1;6(3):392–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000070.

Pedersen SF, Thrysøe SA, Robich MP, et al. Assessment of intramyocardial hemorrhage by T1-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Resonance. 2012;14(1):59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-59.

Thavendiranathan P, Walls M, Giri S, et al. Improved detection of myocardial involvement in acute inflammatory cardiomyopathies using T2 mapping. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(1):102-10. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.967836.

Usman AA, Taimen K, Wasielewski M, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance T2 mapping in the monitoring and follow-up of acute cardiac transplant rejection: a pilot study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(6):782-90. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.971101.

Maroules CD, McColl R, Khera A, Peshock RM. Interstudy reproducibility of SSFP cine magnetic resonance: impact of magnetic field strength and parallel imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27(5):1139-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21343.

Zange L, Muehlberg F, Blaszczyk E, et al. Quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: agreement of software from three different vendors on assessment of left ventricular function, 2D flow and parametric mapping. J Cardiovas Magn Reson. 2019;21(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-019-0522-y.

Hudsmith LE, Cheng ASH, Tyler DJ, et al. Assessment of left atrial volumes at 1.5 tesla and 3 tesla using FLASH and SSFP cine imaging. J Cardiovas Magn Reson. 2007;9(4):673-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10976640601138805.

Gottbrecht M, Kramer CM, Salerno M. Native T1 and extracellular volume measurements by cardiac MRI in healthy adults: a meta-analysis. Radiology. 2019;290(2):317-26. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180226.

Von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Prothmann M, Dieringer MA, et al. Myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 3 T: reference values, influencing factors and implications. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-53.

Roy C, Slimani A, de Meester C, et al. Age and sex corrected normal reference values of T1, T2 T2* and ECV in healthy subjects at 3T CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19(1):72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0371-5.

Razzaq S, Haririsanati L, Eyre K, et al. Inter-scanner comparability of Z-scores for native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping. J Cardiovasc Magnetic Resonance. 2024;26(1): 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2023.100004.

Kranzusch R, Siepen FAD, Wiesemann S, et al. Z-score mapping for standardized analysis and reporting of cardiovascular magnetic resonance modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) T1 data: Normal behavior and validation in patients with amyloidosis, J Cardiovasc Magnetic Resonance. 2020;22(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-019-0595-7.

Lin K, Suwa K, Ma, et al. Variability of native T1 values: implication for defining regional myocardial changes using MRI. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;34(10):1637- 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1371-8.

Aus dem Siepen F, Baumgärtner C, Müller-Henessen M, et al. Variability of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 mapping parameters in healthy volunteers during long-term follow-up. Open Heart. 2018;5(1):e000717. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2017-000717.

Alfakih K, Plein S, Thiele H, et al. Normal human left and right ventricular dimensions for MRI as assessed by turbo gradient echo and steady-state free precession imaging sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17(3):323-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10262.

Maceira AM, Prasad S, Khan M, Pennell DJ. Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magnetic Resonance. 2006;8(3):417-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10976640600572889.

Raisi-Estabragh Z, Szabo L, McCracken C, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance reference ranges from the healthy hearts consortium. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024:S1936-878X(24)00061-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.01.009.

Kawel-Boehm N, Maceira A, Valsangiacomo-Buechel ER, et al. Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children. J Cardiovasc Magnetic Resonance. 2015;17(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0111-7.

Macedo R, Lara Fernandes J, Souza Andrade S. et al. Morphological and functional measurements of the heart obtained by magnetic resonance imaging in Brazilians. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013;101(1):68-77. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20130113.

Raisi-Estabragh Z, Kenawy AAM, Aung N, et al.Variation in left ventricular cardiac magnetic resonance normal reference ranges: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;22(5):494-504. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa089.

Natori S, Lai S, Finn JP. Cardiovascular function in multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: normal values by age, sex, and ethnicity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(6 Suppl 2):S357-65. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.1868.

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

(1)
Reyes Márquez, L. C.; Hinestroza Perea, C. A.; Aldana Sepúlveda, N. A.; Marín Pineda, D. M.; Zuluaga Santamaría, A. Normal Values of Native T1 T2 Maps and Ventricular Function in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 3T Scanner. Rev. colomb. radiol. 2025, 36, 6389-6398.
Article metrics
Abstract views610
Galley views248
PDF Views248
HTML views0
Other views0